(note: this poem was inspired via a conversation with a friend, who wished that on my blog there was "less you & more work" -- this brings up one of the "hottest" topics in poetics today, of which at the bottom of commment i've provided some links to relevant discussions thereof.and now, by requestless more & more less --remove that author!witha disjunCtive tosstogetherass if cut-upOn need no scissor,finger, easy Mulch as any wormdplaced placePless page waistso a fit compUter won't compoany commu, Toward the blockage --no!swerve! stEering ship w/o starsshall shink e-eRrors downbottoms& shunk this uPon hollow hullacause rivets Only has handsto hold sheety Exit lined driftpin& cannot miss The gib, fittingson rip bit by bit Replacing spacewitha simple prY of ending loss-- last inkline asail thru icey bergsonly enough above for hint atwhat continues below, watertighthatchbattens on hawse-hole,these chains so linked, pullingmyriad shit under poopdeck.arc of visibility until vanishing angle& no togey for punishment( intrinsic severity )kissing the gunner's daughternever kink'd such individualas if strokes were school --yes, learn!crowd'd so close ain'tno room to swing a cateverybody everywhereall-the-time : everything,but load'd to the gunwalesis good way to get drunklet go & haul!windward!po-ahoy!always in the offing,anchorage.aye aye Cap'n!__________________________________see:Gary Sullivan review:PPL In a Depot( a review by Nicholas Manning inwhich anwering paradoxical questions of )"Of course, I feel that it is hardly necessary to say that Gary Sullivan, and Flarf writing in general, in no way bounces “genre, authorship, taste, and all the other no longer interesting issues out of the house.” It is difficult to see how any form of contemporary writing -- even that of the most hardcore transceptual -- could claim such wide-reaching manumission. Genre is not important in PPL? Isn’t the question of genre the central grounding feature at the base of Mohammad and Doris’s articulate desire to identify for Sullivan’s writing a specific literary grounding? Taste is not an issue? Isn’t the notion of taste -- as I’ll attempt to suggest later -- one of the primary preoccupations of these intricate, ambiguous dialogues?"& Tony Tost "system says"unquiet grave(Tuesday, May 06, 2008 & update Sunday, May 11, 2008)& on our perceptual apparatus in general, Angela Genusa has posted a bit of Žižek :Tijuana Taxidermied Typewriter________________________________.
Legg inn en kommentar